El diseño de sistemas más similares y más diferentes para la investigación en el área de la comunicación de crisis
Resumen
Este artículo contribuye a la metodología de la investigación en comunicación de crisis. Explora las potencialidades, valores y limitaciones del diseño de sistemas más similares y más diferentes para la investigación de la comunicación de crisis revisando su desarrollo y aplicación dentro del campo de la política comparada. Como modo de investigación científico social, proponemos que este método de investigación tiene el potencial de unir el rico legado de estudios de casos interpretativos de la investigación en comunicación de crisis con su creciente cuerpo de investigación experimental, y que puede agregar una capa intrigante de investigación al campo. Para concluir, el artículo sugiere direcciones para futuras investigaciones comparadas sobre comunicación de crisis.
Citas
Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2015). Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2), 495-510.
An, S.-K. & Cheng, I.-H. (2010). Crisis communication in public relations journals: Tracking research trends over thirty years. In: Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (Eds.). (2010). The Handbook of Crisis Communication (pp. 65-90). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444314885.ch3
Auer, C., Schwarz, A, Seeger, M. (2016). Communication – Conclusions for an Integrative Approach to International Crisis Communication Research. In A. Schwarz, M., Seeger, & C. Auer (Eds.) The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research (pp. 66-71). Wiley Blackwell.
Avery, E. J., Lariscy, R. W., Kim, S., & Hocke, T. (2010). A quantitative review of crisis communication research in public relations from 1991 to 2009. Public Relations Review, 36(2), 190-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.01.001
Bates, R. H. (1997). Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy? PS: Political Science and Politics, 30(2), 166–169. https://doi.org/10.2307/420485
Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2007). Qualitative methods: The view from the subfields Comparative Political Studies, 40(2), 111–121.
Brislin, R. W. (1976). Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural studies. International journal of psychology, 11(3), 215-229.
Cheng, J. L. (1994). On the concept of universal knowledge in organizational science: Implications for cross-national research. Management Science, 40(1), 162-168.
Collier, D. (2008). Symposium: Case Selection, Case Studies, and Causal Inference.
Introduction. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, 6(2), 2–4.
Coppedge, M. (1999). Thickening Thin Concepts and Theories: Combining Large N and Small in Comparative Politics. Comparative Politics, 31(4), 465–476.
Cutler, A. (2004). Methodical failure: The use of case study method by public relations researchers. Public Relations Review, 30(3), 365-375.
Coombs, W.T. (2016). Methodological Challenges of International Crisis Communication Research. In A. Schwarz, M. Seeger, & C. Auer (Eds.) The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research (pp. 456-464). Wiley Blackwell.
Coombs, W.T. (2010). Parameters for crisis communication. In: Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (Eds.). (2010). The Handbook of Crisis Communication (pp. 17-53). Wiley- Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444314885.ch1
Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (Eds.) (2010). The Handbook of Crisis Communication (pp. 65-90). Wiley-Blackwell.
Esser, F. (2019). Advances in comparative political communication research through contextualization and cumulation of evidence. Political Communication, 36(4), 680-686.
Esser, F & Hanitzsch, T (2012). On the why and how of comparative communication inquiry in communication studies. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.) The handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 3-24). Routledge
Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2008). Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. In J. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady,& D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (pp. 756–778). Oxford Handbooks
Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2010). Crisis communication, complexity, and the cartoon affair: A case study. In: Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (Eds.). (2010). The Handbook of Crisis Communication (pp. 425-448). Wiley-Blackwell.
García, C. (2010). Could it happen again? Catholic Church Image Repair Strategies in the Revocation of the Excommunication of the Four Lefebvrian Bishops. Public Relations Review, 36(1), 70-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.10.011
Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection for Case-study Analysis: Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques. In J. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (pp. 645–684). Oxford Handbooks
Gerring, J. (2007). The case study: what it is and what it does. In The Oxford handbook of comparative politics.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. The MIT Press
Goertz, G. (2008). Choosing Cases for Case Studies: A Qualitative Logic. Qualitative & Multi- Method Research, 6(2), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473913882.n10
Gilpin, D. R., & Murphy, P. (2010). Complexity and Crises: A New Paradigm. In: Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (Eds.). (2010). The Handbook of Crisis Communication (pp. 65-90). Wiley-Blackwell.
Ha, J. H., & Boyton, L. (2014). Has crisis communication been studied using an interdisciplinary approach? A 20-year content analysis of communication journals. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 8(1), 29-44.
Hanitzsch, T., & Esser, F. (2012). Challenges and perspectives of comparative communication inquiry. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 501-516). Routledge
Hartley, J. (2004). Case study research. In C. Cassell, C., & G. Symon (Eds.). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 323-333). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280119
Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and Causal Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960. https://doi.org/10.2307/2289064
Huang, Y. H. (2006). Crisis situations, communication strategies, and media coverage: A multicase study revisiting the communicative response model. Communication Research, 33(3), 180-205.
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 16(2), 131-152.
Jiang, J, Huang, Y., Wu, F., Choy, H., & Lin, D. (2015). At the crossroads of inclusion and distance: Organizational crisis communication during celebrity-endorsement crises in China. Public Relations Review, 41(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.003
Blatter, J., & Haverland, M. (2012). Designing case studies: Explanatory approaches in small-N research. Palgrave Macmillan.
Katznelson, I. (2009). Strong Theory, Complex History: Structure and Configuration in Comparative Politics Revisited. In Mark Irving. Lichbach & A. S. Zuckerman (Eds.), Comparative Politics Rationality, Culture, and Structure. (2nd ed., pp. 134–161). Cambridge University Press.
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press.
Kuipers, S., & Schonheit, M. (2022). Data breaches and effective crisis communication: a comparative analysis of corporate reputational crises. Corporate Reputation Review, 25(3), 176-197.
Lieberman, E. S. (2005). Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 435-452.
Lieberson, S (1991). Small N's and big conclusions: an examination of the reasoning in comparative studies based on a small number of cases." Social Forces 70 (2): 307-320. Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682–693. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955513
Lijphart, A. (1975). The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative Political Studies, 8(2), 158–177.
Liu, B. F. (2010). Distinguishing how elite newspapers and A-list blogs cover crises: Insights for managing crises online. Public Relations Review, 36(1), pp. 28-34.
Lyu, J. C. (2012). A comparative study of crisis communication strategies between Mainland China and Taiwan: The melamine-tainted milk powder crisis in the Chinese context. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 779-791.
Manias-Muñoz, I., Jin, Y., & Reber, B. H. (2019). The state of crisis communication research and education through the lens of crisis scholars: An international Delphi study. Public relations review, 45(4), 101797.
Maiorescu, R. D. (2016). Crisis management at General Motors and Toyota: An analysis of gender-specific communication and media coverage. Public Relations Review, 42(4), pp. 556-563.
Meckstroth, T. W. (1975). “Most Different Systems” and “Most Similar Systems”: A Study in the Logic of Comparative Inquiry. Comparative Political Studies, 8(2), 132–157.
Morton, R. B., & Williams, K. C. (2008). Experimentation in Political Science. In J. M. Box- Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (pp. 339–356). Oxford University Press.
Olsson, E.-K., Nord, L.W. & Falkenheimer, J. (2015). Media Coverage Crisis Exploitation Characteristics: A Case Comparison Study. Journal of Public Relations Research, 27(2), 158-174.
Persson, Erik Stig. (2016). Flood Response Using Complementary Early Warning Information. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 24(4), 253-263.
Pierson, P., & Skocpol, T. (2002). Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. Political science: The state of the discipline, 3, 693-721.
Pfetsch, B. & Esser, F. (2012). Comparing political communication. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 25-47). Routledge.
Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. Wiley- Interscience. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162713960017
Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
Ross, M. H. (2009). Culture in Comparative Political Analysis. In Mark Irving. Lichbach & A. S. Zuckerman (Eds.), Comparative Politics Rationality, Culture, and Structure (pp. 134–161). Cambridge University Press.
Reeskens, T., & Hooghe, M. (2008). Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of generalized trust. Evidence from the European Social Survey (2002 and 2004). Social Indicators Research, 85(3), 515-532.
Sartori, G. (1991). Comparing and Miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692891003003001
Scanlon, J. (2012). Parallel planning, local solutions: Four Newfoundland Airports Deal Diverted Flights after 9/11. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 20(3), 180-188.
Schwarz, A. (2014): Die Nuklearkatastrophe als Gegenstand internationaler Krisenkommunikation: eine länder- und kulturvergleichende Untersuchung der Fukushima-Berichterstattung auf Basis des Framing-Ansatzes. In: Wolling, J. & Arlt, D. (Eds.) Fukushima und die Folgen - Medienberichterstattung, Öffentliche Meinung, Politische Konsequenzen. Ilmenau, Univ.-Verl. Ilmenau. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-49412-1.
Schwarz, A., Seeger, M., & Auer, C. (2016). Significance and structure of international risk and crisis communication research: Toward an integrative approach. In A. Schwarz, M., Seeger, & C. Auer (Eds.), The handbook of international crisis communication research (pp. 1-10). Wiley Blackwell.
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.
Seeger, M., & Ulmer, R. (2002). A post-crisis discourse of renewal: The cases of Malden Mills and Cole Hardwoods. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(2), 126-142.
Skocpol T, Pierson P. (2002). Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science. In I. Katznelson & HV Milner (Eds.). Political Science: State of the Discipline (pp. 693-721). W.W. Norton.
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge University Press.
Tian, Y., & Yang, J. (2022). Deny or bolster? A comparative study of crisis communication strategies between Trump and Cuomo in COVID-19. Public Relations Review, 48(2), 102182.
Tarrow, S. (1995). Bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide in political science. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 471–474.
Ulmer, R. R., & Sellnow, T. L. (2000). Consistent questions of ambiguity in organizational crisis communication: Jack in the Box as a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(2), 143- 155.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational research methods, 3(1), 4-70.
Volk, S. C. (2021). Comparative communication research. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Wang, X. and Z. Wang (2014). The effect of product-harm crisis situations on firms’ spokesperson strategies: Evidence from China's emerging market economy. Public Relations Review, 40(1), pp. 110-112.
Williams, D. E., & Treadaway, G. (1992). Exxon and the Valdez accident: A failure in crisis communication. Communication Studies, 43(1), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979209368359
Wirth, W. & Kolb, S (2012). Securing equivalence: Problems and Solutions. F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of comparative communication research (pp. 469-485). Routledge.
Woods, C. L. (2016). When more than reputation is at risk: How two hospitals responded to Ebola. Public Relations Review, 42(5), 893-902.
Yin, S., & Jing, R. (2014). A Schematic View of Crisis Threat Assessment. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 22(2), 97-107.
Zhou, L., & Shin, J. (2017). Does stealing thunder always work? A content analysis of crisis communication practice under different cultural settings. Public Relations Review, 43(5), 1036-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.08.004
Derechos de autor 2024 Claudia Janssen Danyi, Paul Danyi

Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.